Lop sided Terrorism Definition.

New definition of the terrorism is to be learned that one   cannot be terrorist because he/she is close to me or following my policy.Can we agree with it? perhaps not ,because this is an international phenomenon-and it cannot be binding in a single country definition.USA declared Maoist non terrorist ,and for this  explanation is - that they are not harming American citizens and not anti American policy.I simply ask is this enough to give a clean cheat to someone ?.Is it not a lop sided definition which has been taken without seeing in the national holistic views  as well as the global interests?.
I think we have to see in the national  and global prospects, and then judge.No doubt that they are better than before ,but exactly  are they falling  in the criteria or not yet to see ?.
Hope, if there is any thing left yet to be fulfilled, would be without prejudices ,and in real sense  it would appear as a civilian party.My wishes are with them.