Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I mean Nepal- Nepal means I.

I wrote yesterday about Nepal inefficiency in leading the nation .NAM Summit in Tehran is a great embarrassment to  nation.I found Nepal's leading capacity was nil and there was no Nepal's stand on the world crisis.No vision was produced to save the NAM future ,and gain its legitimate right to be in the Security Council as well as to bring suitable ideas for long waited UN reform.New International Economic Order remain a dream ,and economic equitable distribution of opportunities stayed far from the green signal.
Unity among the members and to remain free from the foreign grips appeared a vital agenda to be handled.No strong strategy was adopted for fighting in UN for the cause of NAM in the economic rights Fields.All were near to the  problems but far from the avenues of solutions.Nepal was primarily recognized as a spectator.
Moreover,Nepalese Prime Minister's secret meetings with the Indian counter part classified Nepal  very close to Bhutan.All diplomatic norms seems invalid for Nepal.
Moral demands quit the post for both PM and FM, who are responsible for this humiliation for the nation.
I see big problem  here is to understand by individual- I mean Nepal and Nepal means I.
Can we give up this pernicious attitude and behave with dignity of the position ?.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home