Stop source of crime
After killing Col. Gaddafi of Libya many valid and serious questions arise.
Is it the end of crime?Is it a correct method to deal with?What is validity of United Nations now, if international cases are handled irrational way?And considering all international laws, should we ratify this action?How does it effect us?
After killing Osama bin Laden, did crime or terrorism in this world finish?Or, on the contrary, those who are involved in this, have became more vulnerable?.This war is against terrorism not any religion ,human and social values and ethos.UN should fight this war not a country or group of countries directly or indirectly.If we do follow this method, be sure ,tomorrow world, I see a horrible where no one will be safe.Old wise advices suggest to kill the source of crime if we intend to eradicate it.
Let United Nation convene a summit on this type of crimes and ask what all HOS/HOG wants to do with this type of crimes.
I am afraid we are creating a bomb which can kill all of us any time.
UN role is not barred?,why UN is so timid?Do there, now, any international order prevail or not?
NAM should shun their activities -seems a coward organization ,who has no voice and power to deal with.Now, there is no validity of NAM.One day we may say or ask the same question for United Nations.Be aware.
NESA of USA asked my opinion as I am alumni of it ,and I have replied in the same spirit.We want a permanent solution.
We all are Democrats but it has its limitation ,and every disease has its own medicine.This is unconventional disease ,I agree, so there should be, of course, unconventional medicine, but within the umbrella of UN.
We have seen all countries ,where forcefully regime are changed ,the nationals are suffering worst situation than before.So question arises why then we change if better can 't be done?Simply to satisfy our ego?Or there is any interior motive behind it?
Tomorrows,Syria,Yemen and many other African countries can be listed ?
Or, should we make null and void all international laws and say for all crimes there is only one medicine -kill him.??
If we go forward on this path then -in near days history can be repeated!
We wish democracy flourish and develop in a acceptable manner according to the soil of that country.Respect for law should be established in all ways.
It is true that in no way we accept a tyrant regime or dictatorial rule in any country .
Better UN should convene a summit on it and decide finally how to handle this type of cases.
There should not be ego-no one country is master of this planet.
Believe in UN and make it stronger to be able to handle all difficult and delicate cases like this one.
Is it the end of crime?Is it a correct method to deal with?What is validity of United Nations now, if international cases are handled irrational way?And considering all international laws, should we ratify this action?How does it effect us?
After killing Osama bin Laden, did crime or terrorism in this world finish?Or, on the contrary, those who are involved in this, have became more vulnerable?.This war is against terrorism not any religion ,human and social values and ethos.UN should fight this war not a country or group of countries directly or indirectly.If we do follow this method, be sure ,tomorrow world, I see a horrible where no one will be safe.Old wise advices suggest to kill the source of crime if we intend to eradicate it.
Let United Nation convene a summit on this type of crimes and ask what all HOS/HOG wants to do with this type of crimes.
I am afraid we are creating a bomb which can kill all of us any time.
UN role is not barred?,why UN is so timid?Do there, now, any international order prevail or not?
NAM should shun their activities -seems a coward organization ,who has no voice and power to deal with.Now, there is no validity of NAM.One day we may say or ask the same question for United Nations.Be aware.
NESA of USA asked my opinion as I am alumni of it ,and I have replied in the same spirit.We want a permanent solution.
We all are Democrats but it has its limitation ,and every disease has its own medicine.This is unconventional disease ,I agree, so there should be, of course, unconventional medicine, but within the umbrella of UN.
We have seen all countries ,where forcefully regime are changed ,the nationals are suffering worst situation than before.So question arises why then we change if better can 't be done?Simply to satisfy our ego?Or there is any interior motive behind it?
Tomorrows,Syria,Yemen and many other African countries can be listed ?
Or, should we make null and void all international laws and say for all crimes there is only one medicine -kill him.??
If we go forward on this path then -in near days history can be repeated!
We wish democracy flourish and develop in a acceptable manner according to the soil of that country.Respect for law should be established in all ways.
It is true that in no way we accept a tyrant regime or dictatorial rule in any country .
Better UN should convene a summit on it and decide finally how to handle this type of cases.
There should not be ego-no one country is master of this planet.
Believe in UN and make it stronger to be able to handle all difficult and delicate cases like this one.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home