I understand that India wishes to review its foreign policies particularly with Nepal and neighbouring countries, in the wake of a strong wave of influence emerging out of China to the surrounding India and the globe.A serious contemplations are going on after all how to counter China and retain the Indian influence in globe in general and in the region in particular?.
It has been now realized by the policies makers that they have done mistakes in the past ,taking easy China, and destabilizing Nepal.They thought they can empower on them, but unfortunately ,had a back fire on them . Now as a result of that ,they are taking an appropriate strategies in countering the threats from China , and repairing the damages. I am afraid ,if this time, they fail in doing so, for long time the ball would go to the court of China which can not be only reconciled by traditional approaches of diplomacy.
Somebody told that a skilled diplomat is born and in the same wave he added that diplomacy needs more that a book reading and a degree.
Perhaps a search to that unseen values has be unveiled?
India's dream to be a global power, is not unnatural seeing its size and potentialities, but for that one has to behave accordingly, and I suppose, they are doing it ,but even if, there is some irritations somewhere for any given reason, should be corrected in unnoticed way.
In region,India has a comfortable presence and good saying..It has to maintain with modesty which I time to time see lacuna in the Indian diplomats,Perhaps they wish to do the best but fail, in that case they should listen the well wishers ,and should not be surrounded by only the traditional non prudent friends whose work is to make you fool and make themselves a winner for their personal benefits.Have to be careful in this regard.
In Nepal ,we have been talking since the day it was signed 1950 Treaty.In depth, no one side is fully aware of the pros and cons.Only parroting the phrases .Note it, please ,what I say now-
1950 Treaty has not been signed by making a big study,neither it never thought what would be loss to the Indians or Nepali.It was written by heart and emotions ,whose objective was only how to make the both people happy, and the countries prosperous -which superceded all treaties.Therefore ,what soever comes and goes - it goes for ever.Now few scholars are demanding its redefinition?Reading books?Coustoms of other countries? Please note Nepal- India has a natural and moral bindings
British has no constitution and managing better that any country in the world.
We should remove the irritations whatsoever comes with mutual understanding and ,ofcourse, in future, we must be very clear about what we are going to do with its impacts for our future generations.
In old diplomatic adage, may be in a diferent sense, says that if there is a bridge in a flowing current river,even by mistake do not remove a single bamboo stick of the bridge,it may become a cause of swaping away the brighe after sometime.It could be fatal.Old Adage still how much valid!
We both countries helped each other even in the presence and absence of text?I am talking about the feelings and emotions ,because they are two brothers and sisters living in two different political land in to days context.We are true neighbours who are ready to help each other in all circumstances.
What normally people like even in the family, there should not be much guardianship because the world has been changing and it has a wider impact on the society.Communication is open and bad thing get first publicity and good thing are hardy in priority.
We have all the best wishes for our Indian brothers.hope this time they will not miss the plane and adjust its foreign policies gracefully.
